본문 바로가기

특허법률 영어표현

(8)
Enablement 요건 관련 Wands Factor를 논하다 상세한 내용은 아래의 USPTO의 MPEP 내용을 참조하시기 바랍니다. https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2164.html WANDS factors에 대해서 한국 변리사, 민과 미국 변호사/변리사, 데이비드가 논의하는 장면입니다. Min: "David, could we go over these WANDS factors one by one? I want to understand how each factor affects our responses to enablement rejections." David: "Of course, Min. Let's start with the first factor: the quantity of experimentation neces..
미국특허청의 Enablement 요건 관련 새로운 가이드라인을 논하다. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=4d1750ed-3f61-4c7d-b372-860644494a65
합리적인 로열티 계산은 어떻게 하나요? (미국 특허법) In the context of patent infringement cases in the United States, the calculation of reasonable royalties is a critical aspect. The court often determines this amount as compensation for the unauthorized use of a patented invention. There are several factors considered in calculating reasonable royalties, commonly referred to as the Georgia-Pacific factors, originating from the case Georgia-Paci..
Every Element of the Asserted Claim "A patent infringement claim must establish that the accused product or process contains every element of the asserted claim or its equivalent." This sentence emphasizes the need for a comprehensive comparison in patent infringement cases. . This conversation revolves around the legal sentence we discussed: --- Alex: "Jamie, have you reviewed the patent claims we're considering asserting against..
Dot the i’s and cross the t’s Today's expression is "dot the i's and cross the t's." This idiom means to be very thorough and meticulous in your work, paying attention to every detail. In the context of preparing for a trial in a patent infringement action, this expression emphasizes the importance of being thorough in reviewing all documents, evidence, and legal arguments. Before the trial, make sure we dot the i's and cros..
Doctrine of Equivalents — English Speaking Today's expression is "doctrine of equivalents." This is a legal principle in patent law where an infringement occurs if a product or process does not literally infringe upon the patented invention's claims but does the same work in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result. Let's look at it in different settings: 1. Writing Example: "The court found infringement under ..
The patent claims must distinctly claim the subject matter … Today's legal sentence is: "The patent claims must distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor regards as the invention." This sentence focuses on the requirement in patent law that the claims of a patent application must be clear and distinct, specifying exactly what the invention is and what it includes. It's important for understanding how to draft effective patent claims. Sam: Hey..
Think Outside the Box Today's expression is "think outside the box." 오늘의 표현은 "상자 밖에서 생각하라"입니다. It means to think creatively, without adhering to traditional ideas or norms. In a professional setting, it encourages innovative thinking and finding unique solutions to problems. 기존의 관념이나 규범에 얽매이지 않고 창의적으로 생각한다는 뜻입니다. 전문적인 환경에서는 혁신적인 사고와 문제에 대한 독특한 해결책을 찾도록 장려합니다. "To overcome this patent challenge, we need to think outsi..